benndragon (
brynndragon) wrote2011-04-09 06:32 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
This is not a feature, Google
You know how, when you make a typo in Google and it auto-redirects, it actively tells you it is doing so ("Showing results for $new_search. Search instead for $original_search")?
Google Maps does not tell you it is redirecting. At all.
It will gladly give you a completely different town than the one you asked for, and the only warning it has done so is giving the new town in tiny font underneath the street name, the same as if that's what you'd typed in. There wasn't even a "Did you mean. . . ?", much less a "Showing $different_town" or a "Could not find $original_address".
This is how I ended up in Brookline last night, having asked to go to Brighton. I am not the only person who had that problem either.
(I'd tell Google about this problem, but my Google-fu fails to tell me how to do so. Ironically enough.)
ETA: An example of this behavior: 52 Brook Street Brighton, MA 02135 - try copy-pastaing that address into Google Maps and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Google Maps does not tell you it is redirecting. At all.
It will gladly give you a completely different town than the one you asked for, and the only warning it has done so is giving the new town in tiny font underneath the street name, the same as if that's what you'd typed in. There wasn't even a "Did you mean. . . ?", much less a "Showing $different_town" or a "Could not find $original_address".
This is how I ended up in Brookline last night, having asked to go to Brighton. I am not the only person who had that problem either.
(I'd tell Google about this problem, but my Google-fu fails to tell me how to do so. Ironically enough.)
ETA: An example of this behavior: 52 Brook Street Brighton, MA 02135 - try copy-pastaing that address into Google Maps and you'll see what I'm talking about.
no subject
[1] It did offer me alternatives in this case but its best guess is really, I think, not even plausible
no subject
I'm still confused why no one in their Cambridge office has ever beaten them about the head for this though.
no subject
I know that as enhanced 911 (a feature that automatically gives the 911 dispatcher the street address of the calling phone - which of course gets all kinds of messed with by the fact that increasingly people don't have landlines and address-locating mobile phones is somewhat iffy business even when the phone contains a GPS receiver... but I digress) was being implemented in the 1990s, states and municipalities were strongly encouraged to do the following two things:
- Develop electronic databases that accurately reflect the physical location of every address on every street
- Change street names as necessary so there would be no duplicate street names in the same municipality
Boston has probably done the former quite well by now but the latter seems like an "ain't never gonna happen."
no subject
no subject
Instead, I'm fascinated by thie analysis of exactly how New England tends to confuse Google... and the back of my mind is sort of chuckling a bit and thinking, "Heh, yeah, I suppose that could be sort of confusing for an outsider..."
Say, do people around there still rely on those fabulous ABC Map and Road Atlases?
no subject
Many gas stations do indeed still have those maps, I just haven't had the need to grab one since my car was stolen last year and there wasn't a nearby gas station when we got to the wrong place. I should get one soon though :).