http://benndragon.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] benndragon.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] brynndragon 2006-04-07 08:07 pm (UTC)

Uh. . . I don't see anything in my comment that refers to $100. I refered to $1200 per year for people who don't have health insurance, which is the closest I can see to $100. Did I miss something in someone else's comment?

I wonder if having some sort of "companies that have $more-than-X profits/year need to pay $something_more_than_individuals/year per uninsured employee" clause, which would compliment the "people who make $more-than-X/year need to pay in full for their coverage with no substidies or else get tax penalites", would be useful. I'd feel a lot better knowing the underemployed weren't paying more than Wal-Mart or Mobil for health care.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting