brynndragon: (Default)
benndragon ([personal profile] brynndragon) wrote2006-10-17 03:55 pm

Virtual Taxation Without Virtual Representation!

When I first heard about this I assumed it was a hoax, like the congress taxing e-mail thing. But I trust the Washington Post to do their homework: Congress ponders virtual taxation of virtual economies. As a side note, they've already got the interaction between real-world and virtual economies figured out - you treat the virtual economy aspect as good-or-service and thus only need to follow the real-world money.

As an aside, I keep wondering if I should do the Second Life thing. Part of me says, "One life should be enough for any person, if it isn't then you're doing something wrong." Another part of me says, "Dude, NPR played an interview with Kurt Vonnegut recorded live in a Second Life studio and Reuters is taking it seriously too. Maybe it's worth checking out." I'm still pondering it.

EDIT: I was trying to say that they already have a system in place to deal with real-world economic interactions of virtual economies (you treat the exchange of real money for virtual money/goods just like any other sale that involves bytes rather than physical goods - in other words you treat it just like a physical good being sold to someone ;P), so they don't need to figure that out. Although they might decide to treat that interaction in some other fashion (I hope not, taxes are complex enough as it is). As for me, all I want is something to stop people from mailing virtual spam about giving them real-world money for virtual goods/money to my virtual mailbox in World of Warcraft comma dammit.

[identity profile] agnosticoracle.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know why they need to think so much about it. If they want to tax virtual they could do it the same way the tax gambling chips. When and if the virtual dollars are converted to US dollars tax the "winnings".

[identity profile] brewergnome.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
::cocks head::

Well, if it directly interacts with the RL economy... sure. Otherwise, HUH?

[identity profile] damhan-alluidh.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Sticky, since a lot of their customers aren't american citizens. (Ahem)

[identity profile] d-klein.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I won't be surprised if in my lifetime a tax is placed on the friggin air I breathe.

[identity profile] dirkcjelli.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
... because of course, the United States owns the internet...

[identity profile] greyhame.livejournal.com 2006-10-17 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Somewhat related, this interesting piece at J. Grim's Laboratorium.