Uh. . . I don't see anything in my comment that refers to $100. I refered to $1200 per year for people who don't have health insurance, which is the closest I can see to $100. Did I miss something in someone else's comment?
I wonder if having some sort of "companies that have $more-than-X profits/year need to pay $something_more_than_individuals/year per uninsured employee" clause, which would compliment the "people who make $more-than-X/year need to pay in full for their coverage with no substidies or else get tax penalites", would be useful. I'd feel a lot better knowing the underemployed weren't paying more than Wal-Mart or Mobil for health care.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 08:07 pm (UTC)I wonder if having some sort of "companies that have $more-than-X profits/year need to pay $something_more_than_individuals/year per uninsured employee" clause, which would compliment the "people who make $more-than-X/year need to pay in full for their coverage with no substidies or else get tax penalites", would be useful. I'd feel a lot better knowing the underemployed weren't paying more than Wal-Mart or Mobil for health care.